The Acer Iconia W4 is a massive upgrade from the earlier W3 and it has a much better display, processor and camera and now can be considered a worthwhile contender when looking for tablets.
Acer introduces the upgraded version of its earlier tablet, the Iconia W4 sporting an 8 inch IPS LCD display with optical binding that reduces glare and improves viewing angle. The display resolution is 1280 x 800 pixels with a ppi of about ~280 to improve viewability to a large extent.
The device runs the latest Windows 8.1 OS to augment the Intel’s latest 1.8GHz Bay trail chip which makes transition between apps brisk and immediate, so it is a welcome refreshment from the earlier W3.
The 5MP camera is capable of shooting Full HD videos at 30FPS frame rate with vibrant colour details even with the low amount of pixels per square inch. Also, it hosts an array of connectivity options like a USB port, a micro USB port, an HDMI port and a micro HDMI port and a microSD slot to allow it to connect to HD devices and accessories like external keyboards and store additional media if the inbuilt 32 GB is insufficient for you.
it is very good tablet. and easy to carry
|Operating System||Windows v8.1|
|Dimensions||219 (H) x 135.0 (W) x 10.8 (T) mm|
|Screen Size||8.0 inches (20.32 cm)|
|Screen Resolution||800 x 1280 pixels|
|Pixel Density||189 ppi|
|Display Type||IPS LCD|
|Touch Screen||Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch|
|Screen to Body Ratio||62.77 %|
|Chipset||Intel Atom Z3740|
|Internal Memory||32 GB|
|Expandable Memory||Up to 32 GB|
|Resolution||5 MP Primary Camera|
|Image Resolution||2592 x 1944 Pixels|
|Camera Features||Digital Zoom|
|Video Recording||1920x1080 @ 30 fps|
|Resolution||2 MP Front Camera|
|Wi-Fi||Wi-Fi 802.11, a/b/g/n|
|HDMI||Micro HDMI (Type D)|
|Audio Jack||3.5 mm|
|Other Sensors||Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope|
Quad core 1.5 GHz vs 1.33 GHz
3.00 GB vs 2.00 GB
Higher primary camera resolution:
13 MP vs 5 MP
10.1 inches vs 8 inches
Quad core 1.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz
Higher battery capacity:
7000 mAH vs 4960 mAH
Sorry, no question asked yet.