Compare LG C3300 vs Motorola Fire XT

Summary
26
Performance

N/A

N/A

Display

N/A

3.5" (Small)

320x480, Low sharpness

Camera

0.3 MP (Main)

5 MP (Main)

0.3 MP (Front)

Battery

N/A

1540 mAh

8 h talktime (2G)

Storage

2 MB

512 MB

32 GB (Expandable)

General
Operating System

Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM, GSM

Single SIM, GSM

SIM Size

Performance
Fair
Processor

800 MHz

Graphics Card

RAM

512 MB

Storage
Good
Internal Memory

2 MB

512 MB

Expandable Memory

No

Yes, Up to 32 GB

USB OTG Support

Display
Basic
Screen Size

3.5 Inch

Screen Resolution

160 x 160 pixels pixels

320 x 480 pixels

Pixel Density

165 ppi

Display Type

Camera
Fair
Main Camera

Yes, 0.3 MP

Yes, 5 MP, Auto focus

Front Camera

Yes, 0.3 MP

Flash

,LED

Video Recording

Zoom

Yes, Digital Zoom

Camera Features

Smile detection, Scenes, Continuos Shooting, Multi Shot

Battery
Fair
Capacity

1540 mAH, Li-ion

Talk Time

Up to 5 Hours(2G)

Up to 8 Hours(2G)

Stand By Time

Connectivity
Operating Frequency

GPRS

Yes, Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps

Yes

Edge

No

Yes

3G

Yes, HSPA

Wi-Fi

Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n

Bluetooth

No

Yes

GPS

Yes, with A-GPS

USB Connectivity

Yes, USB Port

No

More Connectivity

Design
Touch Screen

Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen

Weight

93 grams

114 grams

Dimensions

91 x 47 x 25 mm

114 x 62 x 11.95 mm

Colours

Stylus

Ruggedness

Multimedia
FM Radio

Yes, RDS

Loudspeaker

Audio Jack

expert reviews
LG C3300 review

LG made the mistake of telling us that the C3300 was "designed by a woman with a target women`s audience". We have nothing against phones being design....

Motorola Fire XT Review

Other than the Defy, Motorola doesn`t really have a good Android phone in the Indian market, which is why other companies like Samsung and HTC have co....

customer reviews
Overall User Rating
★★★★★
★★★★★

2.3/5 based on 3 ratings

Sanjay Delhi
★★★★★
★★★★★
★★★★★
★★★★★
★★★★★
★★★★★

1. high price compared to others2.camera-very bad result 3.screen-not enough big 4.as per price samsung galxy y is better than this 5.not good clearity of pictures 6.not good look 7.no dual sim....

Read More Reviews