|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Google Tensor G5
Share
Based on benchmark performance, Samsung Exynos 2400 achieves a higher total AnTuTu score of 1,727,225 (tested by 91Mobiles), compared to Google Tensor G5's 1,565,089 (tested by 91Mobiles), making Samsung Exynos 2400 the more powerful processor.
... read more|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
Jan, 2024
|
Aug, 2025
|
CPU
|
Deca Core
(3.21 GHz, Single Core + 2.9 GHz, Dual core + 2.6 GHz, Tri core + 1.95 GHz, Quad core)
|
Octa core
(3.78 GHz, Single Core + 3.05 GHz, Penta Core + 2.25 GHz, Dual core)
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
3 nm
|
GPU
|
Xclipse 940
|
PowerVR DXT-48-1536
|
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
AnTuTu Score
|
1,727,225
|
1,565,089
|
Geekbench Score
|
2,130/6,557
|
2,344/6,503
|
Phones Powered by These SoCs
Benchmark
AnTuTu
(The higher, the better)
AnTuTu measures CPU, GPU, memory and overall performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 2400
1,727,225
Google Tensor G5
1,565,089
CPU
401,042
787,777
GPU
686,186
101,517
Memory
346,988
295,447
UX
293,009
380,348
Geekbench
(The higher, the better)
The Geekbench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Geekbench Single Core
Samsung Exynos 2400
2,130
Google Tensor G5
2,344
Geekbench Multi Core
Samsung Exynos 2400
6,557
Google Tensor G5
6,503
Benchmark Screenshots
AnTuTu Score:
General
SoC Brand
|
Samsung
|
Google
|
Title
|
Samsung Exynos 2400
|
Google Tensor G5
|
Model No
|
S5E9945
|
GS501
|
Manufacturing
|
Samsung
|
TSMC
|
CPU
Total Cores
|
Deca Core
|
Octa core
|
CPU
|
Deca Core (3.21 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X4 + 2.9 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A720 + 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 + 1.95 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520)
|
Octa core (3.78 GHz, Single Core, Cortex X4 + 3.05 GHz, Penta Core, Cortex A725 + 2.25 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A520)
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Process Node
|
4 nm
|
3 nm
|
Instruction Set
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
ARMv9.2-A
|
L3 Cache
|
8 MB
|
8 MB
|
GPU
GPU
|
Xclipse 940
|
PowerVR DXT-48-1536
|
GPU Clock speed
|
1.095 GHz
|
1.1 GHz
|
Pipelines
|
6
|
6
|
Shading Units
|
128
|
128
|
Total Shaders
|
768
|
768
|
FLOPS
|
3406.8 Gigaflops
|
1689.6 Gigaflops
|
Vulkan Version
|
1.3
|
1.4
|
OpenCL Version
|
2.0 FP
|
3.0 FP
|
DirectX Version
|
12.1
|
12.0
|
Memory
Memory Type
|
LPDDR5X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Memory Speed
|
4.2 GHz
|
4.266 GHz
|
Bus
|
4x16 Bit
|
4x16 Bit
|
Memory Max bandwidth
|
68.2 Gb/s
|
68.2 Gb/s
|
Memory Max size
|
24 GB
|
16 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 4.0
|
UFS 4.0
|
Camera
Max Camera Sensor Supported
|
320 MP
|
200 MP
|
Max Video Capture Resolution
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Video Capture Formats
|
MP4, MOV
|
N/A
|
Display
Max On-Device Display Resolution
|
3840x2400
|
3840x2400
|
Multimedia
Video Playback Resolution
|
8K @ 60 FPS
|
8K @ 30 FPS
|
Video Codecs
|
H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), AV1, VP9
|
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
|
Audio Codecs
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
|
Connectivity
Modem Name
|
Exynos 5400
|
Exynos 5400c
|
5G Support
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Peak Download Speed
|
Up to 12100 Mbps
|
N/A
|
Peak Upload Speed
|
Up to 3670 Mbps
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi Version
|
6
|
7
|
Wi-Fi Standard
|
ax
|
a, ac, ax, b, be, g, n, n 5GHz
|
Bluetooth Version
|
5.3
|
6.0
|
Navigation
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, NavIC, QZSS
|
BeiDou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, QZSS
|
User Feedback
Related Comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Samsung Exynos 2400
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
Samsung Exynos 2400
Apple A18 Pro
Samsung Exynos 2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Samsung Exynos 2400
Apple A17 Pro
Google Tensor G5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
Google Tensor G5
Apple A18 Pro
Google Tensor G5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Google Tensor G5
Apple A17 Pro
Google Tensor G5
Samsung Exynos 2500