User Reviews for Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo

This phone is overpriced, with same hardware XOLO Q1000 Opus is available at 8k.nThe resolution is very bad for 5 inch display. nIt is true for all Samsung phone I would say, This phone is better than Samsung galaxy quattro, but not even close to Moto G in performance.nSamsung galaxy Core should be priced at 9k nSamsung galaxy Quattro should be priced at 10knSamsung Galaxy grand neo should be priced 11k (Same hardware Xolo opus 8k)nSamsung Galaxy Grand 2 should be priced 16K (Same hardware Moto G 16 GB 14K)nSamsung should correct the pricing all the phones are overpriced. There is no point in launching the phone at high price and decreasing the price by time slowly, so better launch at affordable price, just learn from grand success of Moto G.

Best Budget phone....I am using it great performance.

Best Budget phone....I am using it great performance.

Best Budget phone....I am using it great performance.

Bakwaas Phone, better get Moto G, I dont konw what Samsung thinks 17k for this crappy devices.. Even it doesn't have HD Screen, Bulky, laggy, waste of money, I request dont buy this cheap product go for Moto G...

This handset is highly overpriced.nThe correct price for this is no more than 12k.nit might even sell at 13k.nwill sell like hot cake at 11k.nbut at 18+, anyone buying this set is has to be a die-hard samsung fan.nnI see no reason whatsoever to buy this set at 18399.

This is really a very good phone when comparing to other phones:nn-> very fast -- 1.2 quad core processor with 1 GB RAM and with auto non-used processes killer s/w, does not haungs.n-> Amazing battery backup -- Chipset is from broadcom which gives more power backup even when using with wifi.n-> good quality -- does not produce heatn-> More features -- like single handed, multi-window, etc...n-> 5'' screen is really good with excellent touch sensitivity