|
53%
Adcom A40
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
Coolpad 7231
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Adcom A40 vs Coolpad 7231
Comparing the Adcom A40 vs Coolpad 7231 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Coolpad 7231 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Adcom A40 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Coolpad 7231 the better performer.
Display: Both Adcom A40 and Coolpad 7231 offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Adcom A40 and Coolpad 7231 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.
Battery: Adcom A40 offers a higher battery capacity with 1650 mAh, while Coolpad 7231 offers 1500 mAh, making Adcom A40 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Adcom A40 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Coolpad 7231 offers 2 GB, making Adcom A40 the better option for storage.
|
Adcom A40
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
Coolpad 7231
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
19 Nov, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
N/A
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1650 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
2 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(19 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.64 %
|
59.44 %
|
Design
Height
|
126.5 mm
|
121.5 mm
|
Width
|
63.5 mm
|
63 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.5 mm
|
10.5 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
124 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1650 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
2 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v2.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|