|
53%
Adcom A40
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
Haier E619
₹4,000
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Adcom A40 vs Haier E619
Comparing the Adcom A40 vs Haier E619 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Adcom A40 and Haier E619 run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: Both Adcom A40 and Haier E619 offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Haier E619 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Adcom A40 offers 2 MP, making Haier E619 better for rear camera photography.
Battery: Adcom A40 offers a higher battery capacity with 1650 mAh, while Haier E619 offers 1400 mAh, making Adcom A40 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Adcom A40 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Haier E619 offers 4 GB, making Adcom A40 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Adcom A40 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while Haier E619 has a rating of 2.6.
|
✕
Adcom A40
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Haier E619
₹4,000
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
19 Nov, 2014
|
15 Dec, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
N/A
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1650 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(19 ratings)
|
2.6/5
(56 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.64 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
126.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
63.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
11.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1650 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|