Adcom KitKat A54
₹1,490
(Discontinued)
|
54%
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Adcom KitKat A54 vs Celkon Win 400
Comparing the Adcom KitKat A54 vs Celkon Win 400 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Adcom KitKat A54 and Celkon Win 400 run at the same processing speed of 1.3 GHz.
Display: Adcom KitKat A54 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Celkon Win 400 offers 4 inches, making Adcom KitKat A54 the larger display of the two. Adcom KitKat A54 features a IPS LCD display compared to Celkon Win 400's TFT, making Adcom KitKat A54 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Adcom KitKat A54 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Celkon Win 400 offers 5 MP, making Adcom KitKat A54 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Adcom KitKat A54 offers a higher front camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Celkon Win 400 offers 1.3 MP, making Adcom KitKat A54 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Adcom KitKat A54 offers a higher battery capacity with 1750 mAh, while Celkon Win 400 offers 1500 mAh, making Adcom KitKat A54 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Adcom KitKat A54 and Celkon Win 400 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Celkon Win 400 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Adcom KitKat A54 has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Adcom KitKat A54
₹1,490
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
26 Nov, 2014
|
27 Nov, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
3.2 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1750 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(8 ratings)
|
4/5
(28 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
65.75 %
|
55.82 %
|
Design
Height
|
145.7 mm
|
125.4 mm
|
Width
|
71.9 mm
|
65 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.2 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
121 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1750 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|