|
71%
Ai+ Pulse 2
₹10,799
@Amazon
|
72%
Itel Zeno 200 4G
₹9,799
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Ai+ Pulse 2 vs Itel Zeno 200 4G
Comparing the Ai+ Pulse 2 vs Itel Zeno 200 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Ai+ Pulse 2 and Itel Zeno 200 4G run at the same processing speed of 1.8 GHz.
Display: Itel Zeno 200 4G offers a screen size of 6.75 inches, while Ai+ Pulse 2 offers 6.74 inches, making Itel Zeno 200 4G the larger display of the two. Itel Zeno 200 4G features a IPS LCD display compared to Ai+ Pulse 2's LCD, making Itel Zeno 200 4G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Ai+ Pulse 2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Itel Zeno 200 4G offers 13 MP, making Ai+ Pulse 2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Ai+ Pulse 2 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Itel Zeno 200 4G offers 5 MP, making Ai+ Pulse 2 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Ai+ Pulse 2 offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Itel Zeno 200 4G offers 5000 mAh, making Ai+ Pulse 2 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Ai+ Pulse 2 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Itel Zeno 200 4G offers 128 GB, making Ai+ Pulse 2 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Ai+ Pulse 2
₹10,799
@ Amazon
|
✕
Itel Zeno 200 4G
₹9,799
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
71%
|
72%
|
Release Date
|
22 Apr, 2026
|
16 Jul, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Unisoc T7250
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
0.08 MP
Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W
|
15W
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(10,120 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
381,574
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 52m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹10,799
@ Amazon
|
₹9,799
@ Amazon
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 02, 2026
(Official)
|
May 08, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v16
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
1 Year
|
1 Year
|
Security Updates
|
3 Year
|
2 Year
|
Custom UI
|
NxtQuantum OS
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Processor
|
Quad core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57
|
Mali-G57
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
381,574
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
31.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
159
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
590 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.29 %
|
92.44 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
165.72 mm
|
170 mm
|
Width
|
76.7 mm
|
70 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
8.29 mm
|
Weight
|
193 grams
|
185 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes IP65
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.854 mm focal length 1.12µm pixel size |
|
0.08 MP
|
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
N/A
|
3120 x 4160 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
10 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @60 fps
HD @30/60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2 Primary Camera3 mm focal length 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
2k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W
|
Yes 15W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 52m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 17m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 n/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
3.5 mm, USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Compare Prices
|
₹10,799
@ Amazon
|
₹9,799
@ Amazon
|