|
53%
Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D
₹12,900
(Out of Stock)
|
Philips W5510
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D vs Philips W5510
Comparing the Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D vs Philips W5510 across performance, display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Philips W5510 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D the better performer.
Display: Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Philips W5510 offers 3.5 inches, making Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D the larger display of the two. Both Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D and Philips W5510 feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Both Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D and Philips W5510 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Battery: Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D offers a higher battery capacity with 2500 mAh, while Philips W5510 offers 1630 mAh, making Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D better for longer battery life.
|
✕
Alcatel One Touch Scribe Easy 8000D
₹12,900
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Philips W5510
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
15 May, 2013
|
13 Sep, 2013
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon S4 Play
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
N/A
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2500 mAh
|
1630 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
N/A
|
User Ratings
|
3.4/5
(43 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 15, 2013
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.1.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz
|
1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 203
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
187 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
63.41 %
|
49.83 %
|
Design
Height
|
143 mm
|
116.2 mm
|
Width
|
78.4 mm
|
63 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
13 mm
|
Weight
|
162 grams
|
138.8 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
HD @24 fps
|
640x480 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2500 mAh
|
1630 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8 Hours(3G) / Up to 9 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 7 Hours(3G) / Up to 10.5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Single SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.394 W/kg Body: 1.133 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
FOTA Online Software Update Evernote Mytracks. etc.
|
N/A
|