|
52%
Archos 40 Cesium
|
Intex Aqua Y2 IPS
₹4,316
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Archos 40 Cesium vs Intex Aqua Y2 IPS
Comparing the Archos 40 Cesium vs Intex Aqua Y2 IPS across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Archos 40 Cesium and Intex Aqua Y2 IPS run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: Both Archos 40 Cesium and Intex Aqua Y2 IPS offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Intex Aqua Y2 IPS features a IPS LCD display compared to Archos 40 Cesium's LCD, making Intex Aqua Y2 IPS the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Intex Aqua Y2 IPS offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Archos 40 Cesium offers 5 MP, making Intex Aqua Y2 IPS better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Intex Aqua Y2 IPS offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Archos 40 Cesium offers 0.3 MP, making Intex Aqua Y2 IPS better for front camera photography.
Battery: Archos 40 Cesium offers a higher battery capacity with 1950 mAh, while Intex Aqua Y2 IPS offers 1400 mAh, making Archos 40 Cesium better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Archos 40 Cesium and Intex Aqua Y2 IPS offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Archos 40 Cesium
|
✕
Intex Aqua Y2 IPS
₹4,316
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
31 Mar, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1950 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.2/5
(71 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows v8.1
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.42 %
|
56.89 %
|
Design
Height
|
126 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
64.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.5 mm
|
9 mm
|
Weight
|
126 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraCMOS image sensor |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1950 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8.62 Hours(3G) / Up to 9.3 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.28 W/kg Body: 1.03 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|