|
53%
Archos 40c Titanium
|
Wham Q4
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Archos 40c Titanium vs Wham Q4
Comparing the Archos 40c Titanium vs Wham Q4 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Archos 40c Titanium and Wham Q4 run at the same processing speed of 1.3 GHz.
Display: Both Archos 40c Titanium and Wham Q4 offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Archos 40c Titanium features a LCD display compared to Wham Q4's TFT, making Archos 40c Titanium the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Archos 40c Titanium and Wham Q4 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Wham Q4 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Archos 40c Titanium offers 0.3 MP, making Wham Q4 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Wham Q4 offers a higher battery capacity with 1800 mAh, while Archos 40c Titanium offers 1450 mAh, making Wham Q4 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Wham Q4 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Archos 40c Titanium offers 4 GB, making Wham Q4 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Archos 40c Titanium
|
✕
Wham Q4
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
10 May, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1450 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.2/5
(627 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
55.55 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
126 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
10 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
110 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1450 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.925 W/kg Body: 0.883 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|