|
64%
Asus Pegasus X002
₹8,999
(Discontinued)
|
ZTE Q519T
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Asus Pegasus X002 vs ZTE Q519T
Comparing the Asus Pegasus X002 vs ZTE Q519T across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Asus Pegasus X002 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.5 GHz, while ZTE Q519T runs at 1.0 GHz, making Asus Pegasus X002 the better performer.
Display: Both Asus Pegasus X002 and ZTE Q519T offer the same screen size of 5 inches, but Asus Pegasus X002 features a IPS LCD display compared to ZTE Q519T's TFT, making Asus Pegasus X002 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Asus Pegasus X002 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while ZTE Q519T offers 5 MP, making Asus Pegasus X002 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Asus Pegasus X002 offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while ZTE Q519T offers 2 MP, making Asus Pegasus X002 better for front camera photography.
Battery: ZTE Q519T offers a higher battery capacity with 4000 mAh, while Asus Pegasus X002 offers 2500 mAh, making ZTE Q519T better for longer battery life.
Storage: ZTE Q519T offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Asus Pegasus X002 offers 16 GB, making ZTE Q519T the better option for storage.
|
✕
Asus Pegasus X002
₹8,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
ZTE Q519T
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
64%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
01 Nov, 2015
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6732
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
|
(upto 1.5 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(2 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v5.0 (Lollipop)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6732
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz
|
Quad core, 1 GHz
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
294 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
64.62 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
146 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
73 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9.9 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
140 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 1900(band 39)
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|