Celkon A35K Campus
₹2,599
(Discontinued)
|
51%
Lava Iris 402e
₹4,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Celkon A35K Campus vs Lava Iris 402e
Comparing the Celkon A35K Campus vs Lava Iris 402e across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Celkon A35K Campus and Lava Iris 402e run at the same processing speed of 1.0 GHz.
Display: Lava Iris 402e offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Celkon A35K Campus offers 3.5 inches, making Lava Iris 402e the larger display of the two. Lava Iris 402e features a LCD display compared to Celkon A35K Campus's TFT, making Lava Iris 402e the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Celkon A35K Campus offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Lava Iris 402e offers 2 MP, making Celkon A35K Campus better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Celkon A35K Campus and Lava Iris 402e feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 402e offers a higher battery capacity with 1450 mAh, while Celkon A35K Campus offers 1400 mAh, making Lava Iris 402e better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris 402e offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Celkon A35K Campus offers 2 GB, making Lava Iris 402e the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris 402e receives a higher user rating of 3.4, while Celkon A35K Campus has a rating of 3.
|
Celkon A35K Campus
₹2,599
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 402e
₹4,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
51%
|
Release Date
|
13 Jun, 2014
|
04 Jul, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
320x480 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1450 mAh
|
Storage
|
2 GB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
3/5
(44 ratings)
|
3.4/5
(59 ratings)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Android v4.2.1 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Single core, 1 GHz
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320x480 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
165 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
48.75 %
|
55.55 %
|
Design
Height
|
119 mm
|
126 mm
|
Width
|
63 mm
|
65 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.7 mm
|
10.35 mm
|
Weight
|
102 grams
|
100 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1450 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 9.6 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
2 GB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|