Celkon Millennia Spark
₹6,999
(Discontinued)
|
55%
M-Horse One A9
₹2,553
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Celkon Millennia Spark vs M-Horse One A9
Comparing the Celkon Millennia Spark vs M-Horse One A9 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: M-Horse One A9 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Celkon Millennia Spark runs at 1.2 GHz, making M-Horse One A9 the better performer.
Display: M-Horse One A9 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Celkon Millennia Spark offers 4.5 inches, making M-Horse One A9 the larger display of the two. M-Horse One A9 features a IPS LCD display compared to Celkon Millennia Spark's TFT, making M-Horse One A9 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: M-Horse One A9 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Celkon Millennia Spark offers 3.2 MP, making M-Horse One A9 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: M-Horse One A9 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Celkon Millennia Spark offers 1.3 MP, making M-Horse One A9 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Celkon Millennia Spark and M-Horse One A9 offer the same 1600 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Celkon Millennia Spark and M-Horse One A9 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Celkon Millennia Spark
₹6,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
M-Horse One A9
₹2,553
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
55%
|
Release Date
|
24 Jul, 2015
|
09 Feb, 2016
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
540x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
1.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1600 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
2.6/5
(33 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
32 bit
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
540x960 px
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
220 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.84 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
133.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
66.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
10.1 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
100 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1600 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|