|
54%
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Jivi JSP Q56
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Celkon Win 400 vs Jivi JSP Q56
Comparing the Celkon Win 400 vs Jivi JSP Q56 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Celkon Win 400 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Jivi JSP Q56 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Celkon Win 400 the better performer.
Display: Jivi JSP Q56 offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Celkon Win 400 offers 4 inches, making Jivi JSP Q56 the larger display of the two. Jivi JSP Q56 features a LCD display compared to Celkon Win 400's TFT, making Jivi JSP Q56 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Jivi JSP Q56 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Celkon Win 400 offers 5 MP, making Jivi JSP Q56 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Jivi JSP Q56 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Celkon Win 400 offers 1.3 MP, making Jivi JSP Q56 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Jivi JSP Q56 offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Celkon Win 400 offers 1500 mAh, making Jivi JSP Q56 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Celkon Win 400 and Jivi JSP Q56 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Celkon Win 400 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Jivi JSP Q56 has a rating of 3.1.
|
✕
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Jivi JSP Q56
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
27 Nov, 2014
|
23 Dec, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(28 ratings)
|
3.1/5
(36 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
55.82 %
|
59.46 %
|
Design
Height
|
125.4 mm
|
139 mm
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
67.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
9.9 mm
|
Weight
|
121 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|