|
54%
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris Win1
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Celkon Win 400 vs Lava Iris Win1
Comparing the Celkon Win 400 vs Lava Iris Win1 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Celkon Win 400 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris Win1 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Celkon Win 400 the better performer.
Display: Both Celkon Win 400 and Lava Iris Win1 offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Lava Iris Win1 features a LCD display compared to Celkon Win 400's TFT, making Lava Iris Win1 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Celkon Win 400 and Lava Iris Win1 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Lava Iris Win1 offers 0.3 MP, making Celkon Win 400 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Lava Iris Win1 offers a higher battery capacity with 1950 mAh, while Celkon Win 400 offers 1500 mAh, making Lava Iris Win1 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris Win1 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Celkon Win 400 offers 4 GB, making Lava Iris Win1 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Celkon Win 400 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Lava Iris Win1 has a rating of 3.9.
|
✕
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris Win1
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
27 Nov, 2014
|
04 Dec, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1950 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(28 ratings)
|
3.9/5
(1,751 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Dec 04, 2014
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
55.82 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
125.4 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
121 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1950 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|