|
54%
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
M-Tech Opal S2
₹1,690
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Celkon Win 400 vs M-Tech Opal S2
Comparing the Celkon Win 400 vs M-Tech Opal S2 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Celkon Win 400 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while M-Tech Opal S2 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Celkon Win 400 the better performer.
Display: Celkon Win 400 offers a screen size of 4 inches, while M-Tech Opal S2 offers 3.5 inches, making Celkon Win 400 the larger display of the two. M-Tech Opal S2 features a LCD display compared to Celkon Win 400's TFT, making M-Tech Opal S2 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while M-Tech Opal S2 offers 2 MP, making Celkon Win 400 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while M-Tech Opal S2 offers 0.3 MP, making Celkon Win 400 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while M-Tech Opal S2 offers 1300 mAh, making Celkon Win 400 better for longer battery life.
Storage: M-Tech Opal S2 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Celkon Win 400 offers 4 GB, making M-Tech Opal S2 the better option for storage.
User Rating: M-Tech Opal S2 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Celkon Win 400 has a rating of 4.
|
✕
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
M-Tech Opal S2
₹1,690
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
27 Nov, 2014
|
26 Nov, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(28 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(5 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
55.82 %
|
50.59 %
|
Design
Height
|
125.4 mm
|
116.3 mm
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
62 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
121 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 4 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|