|
54%
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Posh Pegasus C350
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Celkon Win 400 vs Posh Pegasus C350
Comparing the Celkon Win 400 vs Posh Pegasus C350 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Celkon Win 400 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Posh Pegasus C350 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Celkon Win 400 the better performer.
Display: Celkon Win 400 offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Posh Pegasus C350 offers 3.5 inches, making Celkon Win 400 the larger display of the two. Posh Pegasus C350 features a LCD display compared to Celkon Win 400's TFT, making Posh Pegasus C350 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Posh Pegasus C350 offers 2 MP, making Celkon Win 400 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Posh Pegasus C350 offers 0.3 MP, making Celkon Win 400 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while Posh Pegasus C350 offers 1000 mAh, making Celkon Win 400 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Posh Pegasus C350 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Celkon Win 400 offers 4 GB, making Posh Pegasus C350 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Posh Pegasus C350
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
27 Nov, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
Spreadtrum SC6820
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(28 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v2.3.5 (Gingerbread)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Spreadtrum SC6820
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Single core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
55.82 %
|
49.39 %
|
Design
Height
|
125.4 mm
|
116.5 mm
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
63.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
12.8 mm
|
Weight
|
121 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|