|
53%
DOMO nTice F12
|
Lava Iris X1 4GB
₹6,951
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
DOMO nTice F12 vs Lava Iris X1 4GB
Comparing the DOMO nTice F12 vs Lava Iris X1 4GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both DOMO nTice F12 and Lava Iris X1 4GB run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: DOMO nTice F12 offers a screen size of 5.2 inches, while Lava Iris X1 4GB offers 4.5 inches, making DOMO nTice F12 the larger display of the two. Lava Iris X1 4GB features a IPS LCD display compared to DOMO nTice F12's TFT, making Lava Iris X1 4GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both DOMO nTice F12 and Lava Iris X1 4GB feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Lava Iris X1 4GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while DOMO nTice F12 offers 0.3 MP, making Lava Iris X1 4GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: DOMO nTice F12 offers a higher battery capacity with 2500 mAh, while Lava Iris X1 4GB offers 1800 mAh, making DOMO nTice F12 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both DOMO nTice F12 and Lava Iris X1 4GB offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: DOMO nTice F12 receives a higher user rating of 4.6, while Lava Iris X1 4GB has a rating of 3.6.
|
✕
DOMO nTice F12
|
✕
Lava Iris X1 4GB
₹6,951
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
27 May, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
Broadcom BCM23550
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2500 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4.6/5
(67 ratings)
|
3.6/5
(2,716 ratings)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 27, 2014
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.1.1 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
Broadcom BCM23550
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A9 ARMv7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
32 bit
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 531
|
Broadcom VideoCore IV
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
RAM Type
|
DDR3
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.2 inches (13.21 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
179 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
59.61 %
|
63.08 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Design
Height
|
151 mm
|
134 mm
|
Width
|
85.5 mm
|
66 mm
|
Thickness
|
12 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
199 grams
|
138 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2500 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 8 GB / 16 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
N/A
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|