|
53%
G-Tide E80
|
54%
Zears Andro Z5
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
G-Tide E80 vs Zears Andro Z5
Comparing the G-Tide E80 vs Zears Andro Z5 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Zears Andro Z5 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while G-Tide E80 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Zears Andro Z5 the better performer.
Display: Both G-Tide E80 and Zears Andro Z5 offer the same screen size of 5 inches, but Zears Andro Z5 features a LCD display compared to G-Tide E80's TFT, making Zears Andro Z5 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while G-Tide E80 offers 5 MP, making Zears Andro Z5 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both G-Tide E80 and Zears Andro Z5 feature a 1.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher battery capacity with 2350 mAh, while G-Tide E80 offers 2100 mAh, making Zears Andro Z5 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both G-Tide E80 and Zears Andro Z5 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
G-Tide E80
|
✕
Zears Andro Z5
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
12 Nov, 2013
|
25 Jan, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
471 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
540x960 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
1.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
2100 mAh
|
2350 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM7
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 531
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
471 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
220 ppi
|
187 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
60.28 %
|
62.66 %
|
Design
Height
|
148 mm
|
146.2 mm
|
Width
|
77.2 mm
|
77.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.6 mm
|
10.4 mm
|
Weight
|
187 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2100 mAh
|
2350 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|