Google Pixel 10A vs vivo V70 FE

Comparing the Google Pixel 10A vs vivo V70 FE across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Google Pixel 10A runs at a higher processing speed of 3.1 GHz, while vivo V70 FE runs at 2.5 GHz, making Google Pixel 10A the better performer.

Display: vivo V70 FE offers a screen size of 6.83 inches, while Google Pixel 10A offers 6.3 inches, making vivo V70 FE the larger display of the two. vivo V70 FE features a AMOLED display compared to Google Pixel 10A's P-OLED, making vivo V70 FE the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: vivo V70 FE offers a higher rear camera resolution with 200 MP, while Google Pixel 10A offers 48 MP, making vivo V70 FE better for rear camera photography.

Front Camera: vivo V70 FE offers a higher front camera resolution with 50 MP, while Google Pixel 10A offers 13 MP, making vivo V70 FE better for front camera photography.

Battery: vivo V70 FE delivers longer battery life with 16h 00m, while Google Pixel 10A delivers 13h 54m, making vivo V70 FE the better pick for all day usage.

Storage: Google Pixel 10A offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while vivo V70 FE offers 128 GB, making Google Pixel 10A the better option for storage.

Expert Review: vivo V70 FE receives a higher expert rating of 8.1 from the editorial team, while Google Pixel 10A is rated 7.9.

User Rating: Google Pixel 10A receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while vivo V70 FE has a rating of 4.3.

Google Pixel 10A

₹47,340

@ Amazon

vivo V70 FE

₹33,250

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

87%

85%

Release Date

06 Mar, 2026

09 Apr, 2026

Performance


Google Tensor G4	MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo
Octa Core (upto 3.1 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
8 GB RAM	8 GB RAM

Display


6.3 inches (16 cm)	6.83 inches (17.35 cm)
P-OLED	AMOLED
1080x2424 px (FHD+)	1260x2800 px (FHD+)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	120 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


48 MP Primary Camera	200 MP Primary Camera
13 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera	8 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

Front Camera


13 MP	50 MP

Battery


5100 mAh	7000 mAh
45W Fast Charging	90W Flash Charging
Wireless Charging	N/A

Storage

256 GB	128 GB
UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Expert Review

7.9/10

Read Expert Review

8.1/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Compact design, improved durability
Decent battery life
7 years of software updates

Unique design
Reliable performance
Decent battery life
Loaded camera features

Cons

Same Tensor G4 chip as Pixel 9a
Limited AI features
Slow charging speed

May not appeal to power users
Camera quality needs improvement

User Ratings

4.5/5

(1,298 ratings)

4.3/5

(336 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

1,400,792 AnTuTu Score	990,352 AnTuTu Score
13h 54m Battery Life (PC Mark)	16h 00m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹47,340

@ Amazon

₹33,250

@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

Video

There are no videos available for the device.

1 Video

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Feb 18, 2026

(Official)

Apr 02, 2026

(Official)

Operating System

Android v16

OS Updates

7 Year

4 Year

Security Updates

7 Year

6 Year

Custom UI

N/A

Origin OS

Performance

Performance Rating

Very Good

Chipset

Google Tensor G4

MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo

Processor

Octa core

3.1 GHz, Single core, Cortex X4 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.92 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520

Octa core

2.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

4 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Mali-G715 MP7

Mali-G615 MP2

RAM

8 GB	8 GB / 12 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5X

LPDDR5

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

1,400,792

990,352

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

8.0 s

15.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

N/A

867

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

9.0 %

N/A

Heating* (The lower, the better)

32.8 %

N/A

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Display Type

P-OLED

AMOLED

Screen Size

6.3 inches (16 cm)

6.83 inches (17.35 cm)

Resolution

1080x2424 px (FHD+)

1260x2800 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

3000 nits

1900 nits

HBM Brightness

1800 nits

N/A

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

Aspect Ratio

20:9

Pixel Density

422 ppi

450 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

85.29 %

90.29 %

Screen Protection

Corning Gorilla Glass Glass 7i

N/A

Bezel-less Display

Yes with punch-hole display

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

Yes

N/A

Design

Height

153.9 mm

163.70 mm

Width

73 mm

76.20 mm

Thickness

9 mm

7.59 mm

Weight

183 grams

200 grams

Build Material

Back: Plastic

Water Resistance

Yes Water resistant IP68

Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69

Ruggedness

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Very Good

Resolution

48 MP
Primary Camera5x Digital Zoomf/1.725 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size

200 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.881/1.56" sensor size S5KHP5

13 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera22 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size

8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

Autofocus

N/A

Yes

OIS

N/A

Yes

Flash

Yes Dual LED Flash

Yes LED Flash

Shooting Modes

N/A	Film Camera SuperMoon

Camera Features

5 x Digital Zoom

N/A

Video Recording

4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps

3840x2160 fps
1920x1080 fps

Video Recording Features

N/A	Optical Image stabilization

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Excellent

Resolution

13 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera

50 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 0.7µm pixel size

Autofocus

N/A

Yes

Flash

Yes	Yes Screen flash

Video Recording

4k @30 fps

3840x2160 fps
1920x1080 fps

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good

Excellent

Capacity

5100 mAh

7000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-Polymer

Li-ion

Quick Charging

Yes 45W Fast Charging

Yes 90W Flash Charging 100% in 60 minutes

Wireless Charging

Yes

N/A

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

13h 54m

16h 00m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

1h 26m 0s

1h 1m 0s

Storage

Internal Storage

256 GB

128 GB / 256 GB

Storage Type

UFS 3.1

Expandable Storage

N/A

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: eSIM

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N12 / N18 / N19 / N20 / N26 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N75 / N77 / N78 / N79

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 1700(band 66) / 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 7009(band 12) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1500(band 21) / 850(band 26)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 3500(band 48) / 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5)

SIM 2

N/A	5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N28 / N75 TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

N/A	4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43) / 3500(band 48) FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 1500(band 32) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20)