HP Ipaq 912 vs Lava Iris 406q

Comparing the HP Ipaq 912 vs Lava Iris 406q across camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while HP Ipaq 912 offers 3 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.

Battery: HP Ipaq 912 offers a higher battery capacity with 1840 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making HP Ipaq 912 better for longer battery life.

Storage: Lava Iris 406q offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while HP Ipaq 912 offers 256 GB, making Lava Iris 406q the better option for storage.

HP Ipaq 912

(Discontinued)

Lava Iris 406q

₹5,299

(Discontinued)

Summary

Release Date

N/A

06 May, 2026

Expert Review

N/A

8.4/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Device yet to be reviewed

Device yet to be reviewed

Compact, premium design
Excellent battery life
Reliable performance
Strong portrait photography

Cons

Device yet to be reviewed

Device yet to be reviewed

Video recording inconsistencies
Colours can be slightly oversaturated

User Ratings

N/A

3.7/5

(1,169 ratings)

4.4/5

(109 ratings)

Compare Prices

Not Available in any store

₹79,999

@ Amazon

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

N/A

May 06, 2026

(Official)

Operating System

Windows Mobile

Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)

Android v16

OS Updates

N/A

5 Year

Security Updates

N/A

7 Year

Custom UI

N/A

Origin OS

Performance

Chipset

N/A

HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 SM8845

Processor

N/A

Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7

Octa core

3.8 GHz, Dual core, Oryon V3 Phoenix L 3.32 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon V3 Phoenix M

Architecture (The higher, the better)

N/A

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

N/A

3 nm

Graphics (GPU)

N/A

Adreno 302

Adreno 829

RAM

256 MB

1 GB

12 GB

RAM Type

N/A

LPDDR5X Ultra

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

N/A

3,000,897

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

N/A

14.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

N/A

4,004

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

N/A

5.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

N/A

17.4 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Type

LCD

TFT

AMOLED

Screen Size

N/A

4.0 inches (10.16 cm)

6.31 inches (16.03 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

480x800 px

1216x2640 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

N/A

5000 nits

Refresh Rate

N/A

120 Hz

Aspect Ratio

N/A

19.5:9

Pixel Density

N/A

233 ppi

460 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

57.38 %

90.11 %

Bezel-less Display

N/A

Yes with punch-hole display

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

N/A

Yes HDR 10+

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

N/A

94.38 %

Design

Height

113 mm

124 mm

150.83 mm

Width

64 mm

71.76 mm

Thickness

16.00 mm

10.3 mm

7.99 mm

Weight

146 grams

N/A

191 grams

Build Material

N/A

Back: Glass

Water Resistance

N/A

Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)

Ruggedness

N/A

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Resolution

3 MP
Primary Camera

5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.57IMX921

N/A

50 MP
f/2.65 Telephoto Camera

N/A

8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

Autofocus

Yes

N/A

Yes

OIS

N/A

Yes

Flash

Yes

Yes LED Flash

Yes Dual LED Flash

Image Resolution

N/A

2592 x 1944 Pixels

N/A

Shooting Modes

N/A

High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode

N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

4 x Digital Zoom

N/A

Video Recording

320x240 @ 15

1280x720 @ 30 fps

8k @30 fps
4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60/120 fps

Front Camera

Resolution

N/A

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

50 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera

Autofocus

N/A

Yes

Flash

N/A

Yes Screen flash

Battery

Capacity

1840 mAh

1700 mAh

6500 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

Quick Charging

N/A

Yes 90W Flash Charging

Wireless Charging

N/A

Yes 40W Wireless Charging

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

N/A

16h 04m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

N/A

0h 41m 0s

Storage

Internal Storage

256 MB

4 GB

256 GB / 512 GB

Storage Type

N/A

UFS 4.1

Expandable Storage

Yes

Yes Up to 32 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

SIM Type

N/A

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano/eSIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

5G 4G

VoLTE

N/A

Yes

SIM 2

N/A

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N18 / N20 / N25 / N26 / N28 / N66 / N71 / N75
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78

N/A

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 1500(band 32) / 700(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 600(Band 71) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) / 1700(band 66)

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)

Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)

Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/n) 5GHz MIMO

Wi-Fi Features

N/A

Mobile Hotspot

Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes v4.0

Yes v6.0

GPS

Yes with A-GPS

Yes with A-GPS Glonass

NFC

N/A

Yes

IR Blaster

N/A

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

USB Type-C

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor

N/A

Yes

Fingerprint Sensor Position

N/A

On-screen

Fingerprint Sensor Type

N/A

Ultrasonic

Other Sensors

N/A

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope

Compare Prices

Not Available in any store

₹79,999

@ Amazon