|
51%
HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM
₹9,990
(Discontinued)
|
52%
Inco Colossus
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM vs Inco Colossus
Comparing the HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM vs Inco Colossus across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM and Inco Colossus run at the same processing speed of 1.0 GHz.
Display: Inco Colossus offers a screen size of 5.3 inches, while HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM offers 4 inches, making Inco Colossus the larger display of the two. Inco Colossus features a LCD display compared to HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM's TFT, making Inco Colossus the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM and Inco Colossus feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM and Inco Colossus feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Inco Colossus offers a higher battery capacity with 2500 mAh, while HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM offers 1300 mAh, making Inco Colossus better for longer battery life.
Storage: HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Inco Colossus offers 1 GB, making HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM the better option for storage.
|
✕
HTC Desire 210 Dual SIM
₹9,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Inco Colossus
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
51%
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
03 May, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Snapdragon S1
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
500 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.3 inches (13.46 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
540x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1300 mAh
|
2500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
1 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(719 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
500 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.3 inches (13.46 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
540x960 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
208 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
55.69 %
|
68.98 %
|
Design
Height
|
125.7 mm
|
142 mm
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
79 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.5 mm
|
12 mm
|
Weight
|
130 grams
|
220 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1300 mAh
|
2500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 9 Hours(3G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
1 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
N/A
|