Intex Aqua Q4
₹5,296
(Discontinued)
|
61%
XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB
₹2,940
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Intex Aqua Q4 vs XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB
Comparing the Intex Aqua Q4 vs XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Intex Aqua Q4 runs at 1.2 GHz, making XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB the better performer.
Display: XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Intex Aqua Q4 offers 4.5 inches, making XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB the larger display of the two. Both Intex Aqua Q4 and XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Intex Aqua Q4 offers 5 MP, making XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Intex Aqua Q4 and XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB feature a 2 MP primary front camera.
Battery: XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB offers a higher battery capacity with 2100 mAh, while Intex Aqua Q4 offers 1800 mAh, making XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB better for longer battery life.
Storage: XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Intex Aqua Q4 offers 4 GB, making XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB the better option for storage.
User Rating: XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while Intex Aqua Q4 has a rating of 3.4.
|
✕
Intex Aqua Q4
₹5,296
(Discontinued)
|
✕
XOLO Cube 5.0 2GB
₹2,940
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
61%
|
Release Date
|
05 Jun, 2015
|
01 Jul, 2015
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1800 mAh
|
2100 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.4/5
(14 ratings)
|
3.6/5
(1,194 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v5.0 (Lollipop)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
2 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR3
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
294 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.61 %
|
67.84 %
|
Design
Height
|
133 mm
|
143 mm
|
Width
|
67 mm
|
71 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.7 mm
|
6.9 mm
|
Weight
|
140 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
2100 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|