|
63%
Intex Cloud Swift
₹7,299
(Discontinued)
|
50%
ZTE Blade Q1
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Intex Cloud Swift vs ZTE Blade Q1
Comparing the Intex Cloud Swift vs ZTE Blade Q1 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Intex Cloud Swift runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while ZTE Blade Q1 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Intex Cloud Swift the better performer.
Display: Intex Cloud Swift offers a screen size of 5 inches, while ZTE Blade Q1 offers 4 inches, making Intex Cloud Swift the larger display of the two. Intex Cloud Swift features a IPS LCD display compared to ZTE Blade Q1's TFT, making Intex Cloud Swift the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Intex Cloud Swift offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while ZTE Blade Q1 offers 2 MP, making Intex Cloud Swift better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Intex Cloud Swift offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while ZTE Blade Q1 offers 0.3 MP, making Intex Cloud Swift better for front camera photography.
Battery: Intex Cloud Swift offers a higher battery capacity with 2500 mAh, while ZTE Blade Q1 offers 1400 mAh, making Intex Cloud Swift better for longer battery life.
Storage: ZTE Blade Q1 offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Intex Cloud Swift offers 16 GB, making ZTE Blade Q1 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Intex Cloud Swift
₹7,299
(Discontinued)
|
✕
ZTE Blade Q1
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
63%
|
50%
|
Release Date
|
20 Oct, 2015
|
13 Oct, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
2500 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(551 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T720 MP2
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
65.63 %
|
56.2 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
144.5 mm
|
126.5 mm
|
Width
|
72.5 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
9.8 mm
|
Weight
|
140 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Smile detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2500 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|