|
49%
Karbonn A1 Plus
₹2,269
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn A1 Plus vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Karbonn A1 Plus vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Karbonn A1 Plus runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Lava Iris 406q offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Karbonn A1 Plus offers 3.5 inches, making Lava Iris 406q the larger display of the two. Both Karbonn A1 Plus and Lava Iris 406q feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Karbonn A1 Plus offers 3 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Karbonn A1 Plus and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Karbonn A1 Plus offers 1500 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris 406q offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Karbonn A1 Plus offers 165 GB, making Lava Iris 406q the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while Karbonn A1 Plus has a rating of 3.3.
|
✕
Karbonn A1 Plus
₹2,269
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
49%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
26 Sep, 2012
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x320 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
3 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
165 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.3/5
(291 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Single core, 1 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x320 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
165 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
52.57 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
114.5 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
60.6 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
13.8 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
130 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
3 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 4 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
165 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.1
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|