Karbonn A40 Indian
₹3,499
(Out of Stock)
|
53%
Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra
₹2,950
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn A40 Indian vs Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra
Comparing the Karbonn A40 Indian vs Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Karbonn A40 Indian and Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra run at the same processing speed of 1.3 GHz.
Display: Both Karbonn A40 Indian and Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Both Karbonn A40 Indian and Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Karbonn A40 Indian and Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Karbonn A40 Indian offers a higher battery capacity with 1400 mAh, while Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra offers 1300 mAh, making Karbonn A40 Indian better for longer battery life.
Storage: Karbonn A40 Indian offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra offers 4 GB, making Karbonn A40 Indian the better option for storage.
User Rating: Karbonn A40 Indian receives a higher user rating of 3.4, while Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra has a rating of 3.3.
|
✕
Karbonn A40 Indian
₹3,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Micromax Bharat 2 Ultra
₹2,950
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
53%
|
Release Date
|
06 Jul, 2017
|
28 Nov, 2017
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Spreadtrum SC9832A
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.4/5
(1,826 ratings)
|
3.3/5
(534 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 06, 2017
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v7.0 (Nougat)
|
Android v6.0 (Marshmallow)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
Spreadtrum SC9832A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.63 %
|
57.28 %
|
Design
Height
|
122.9 mm
|
125 mm
|
Width
|
64.3 mm
|
63.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.5 mm
|
10.1 mm
|
Weight
|
118 grams
|
120 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
No
|
No
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 4 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|