Karbonn A9 Plus
₹9,990
(Out of Stock)
|
54%
XOLO A700
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn A9 Plus vs XOLO A700
Comparing the Karbonn A9 Plus vs XOLO A700 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn A9 Plus runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while XOLO A700 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Karbonn A9 Plus the better performer.
Display: XOLO A700 offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Karbonn A9 Plus offers 4 inches, making XOLO A700 the larger display of the two. Both Karbonn A9 Plus and XOLO A700 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Karbonn A9 Plus and XOLO A700 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Karbonn A9 Plus offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while XOLO A700 offers 0.3 MP, making Karbonn A9 Plus better for front camera photography.
Battery: XOLO A700 offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Karbonn A9 Plus offers 1420 mAh, making XOLO A700 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn A9 Plus and XOLO A700 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Karbonn A9 Plus and XOLO A700 both receive the same user rating of 4.
|
Karbonn A9 Plus
₹9,990
(Out of Stock)
|
XOLO A700
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
30 Oct, 2012
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon S2
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
800x480 px (HD)
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1420 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(277 ratings)
|
4/5
(263 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 30, 2012
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM Cortex A9
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 203
|
PowerVR SGX 531
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
800x480 px (HD)
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
245 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.67 %
|
59.88 %
|
Design
Height
|
120 mm
|
136 mm
|
Width
|
60.5 mm
|
68.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.3 mm
|
9.10 mm
|
Weight
|
105 grams
|
115 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
1280x720 @ 25 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1420 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 4(2G)
|
Up to 3.9(3G) / Up to 6.9(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.1
|
Yes v2.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
N/A
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|