|
52%
Karbonn A99
₹6,713
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn A99 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Karbonn A99 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn A99 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making Karbonn A99 the better performer.
Display: Lava Iris 406q offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Karbonn A99 offers 3.97 inches, making Lava Iris 406q the larger display of the two. Karbonn A99 features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making Karbonn A99 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Karbonn A99 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Karbonn A99 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Karbonn A99 offers 1400 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn A99 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while Karbonn A99 has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Karbonn A99
₹6,713
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
01 Jan, 2017
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.97 inches (10.08 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(379 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.97 inches (10.08 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
235 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
51.06 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
133 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
66 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.7 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|