Karbonn Titanium S35 vs iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G
Comparing the Karbonn Titanium S35 vs iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn Titanium S35 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G runs at 1.0 GHz, making Karbonn Titanium S35 the better performer.
Display: iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Karbonn Titanium S35 offers 4.5 inches, making iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G the larger display of the two. iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G features a IPS LCD display compared to Karbonn Titanium S35's TFT, making iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Karbonn Titanium S35 offers 5 MP, making iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Karbonn Titanium S35 offers 2 MP, making iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G better for front camera photography.
Battery: iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Karbonn Titanium S35 offers 1850 mAh, making iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Karbonn Titanium S35 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G offers 16 GB, making Karbonn Titanium S35 the better option for storage.
User Rating: iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Karbonn Titanium S35 has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium S35
₹2,500
(Discontinued)
|
✕
iBall Andi Cobalt Solus 4G
₹7,092
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|