|
54%
Karbonn Titanium S99
₹5,999
(Discontinued)
|
Spice Stellar 449 3G
₹3,719
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn Titanium S99 vs Spice Stellar 449 3G
Comparing the Karbonn Titanium S99 vs Spice Stellar 449 3G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn Titanium S99 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Spice Stellar 449 3G runs at 1.2 GHz, making Karbonn Titanium S99 the better performer.
Display: Spice Stellar 449 3G offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Karbonn Titanium S99 offers 4 inches, making Spice Stellar 449 3G the larger display of the two. Both Karbonn Titanium S99 and Spice Stellar 449 3G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Karbonn Titanium S99 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Spice Stellar 449 3G offers 3.2 MP, making Karbonn Titanium S99 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Spice Stellar 449 3G offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Karbonn Titanium S99 offers 0.3 MP, making Spice Stellar 449 3G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Spice Stellar 449 3G offers a higher battery capacity with 1450 mAh, while Karbonn Titanium S99 offers 1400 mAh, making Spice Stellar 449 3G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn Titanium S99 and Spice Stellar 449 3G offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium S99
₹5,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Spice Stellar 449 3G
₹3,719
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
23 Jun, 2014
|
15 Aug, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1450 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(104 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (KitKat)
|
Android v4.4 (KitKat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
51.83 %
|
59.68 %
|
Design
Height
|
133 mm
|
134.5 mm
|
Width
|
66 mm
|
69.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.7 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
156 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1450 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 4 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|