|
52%
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
₹3,300
(Discontinued)
|
54%
Fly Snap
₹2,916
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 vs Fly Snap
Comparing the Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 vs Fly Snap across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Fly Snap runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Fly Snap the better performer.
Display: Both Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 and Fly Snap offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Fly Snap features a IPS LCD display compared to Karbonn Titanium Wind W4's LCD, making Fly Snap the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 and Fly Snap feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 and Fly Snap feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers a higher battery capacity with 1950 mAh, while Fly Snap offers 1500 mAh, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 and Fly Snap offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 receives a higher user rating of 3.9, while Fly Snap has a rating of 2.5.
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
₹3,300
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Fly Snap
₹2,916
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
25 Sep, 2014
|
25 Feb, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1950 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(101 ratings)
|
2.5/5
(14 ratings)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows v8.1
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.61 %
|
57.15 %
|
Design
Height
|
125 mm
|
124.2 mm
|
Width
|
64.3 mm
|
64.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.9 mm
|
9.8 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
106 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1950 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|