|
52%
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
₹3,300
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 370
₹2,949
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 vs Lava Iris 370
Comparing the Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 vs Lava Iris 370 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Lava Iris 370 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 the better performer.
Display: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Lava Iris 370 offers 3.5 inches, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 the larger display of the two. Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 features a LCD display compared to Lava Iris 370's TFT, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Lava Iris 370 offers 2 MP, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 and Lava Iris 370 feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers a higher battery capacity with 1950 mAh, while Lava Iris 370 offers 1300 mAh, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris 370 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers 4 GB, making Lava Iris 370 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 receives a higher user rating of 3.9, while Lava Iris 370 has a rating of 3.2.
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
₹3,300
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 370
₹2,949
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
25 Sep, 2014
|
30 Mar, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1950 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(101 ratings)
|
3.2/5
(41 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows v8.1
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Single core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.61 %
|
54.01 %
|
Design
Height
|
125 mm
|
110 mm
|
Width
|
64.3 mm
|
61.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.9 mm
|
11.5 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
120 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Burst mode
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1950 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 5.5 Hours(3G) / Up to 10 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|