|
52%
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
₹3,300
(Discontinued)
|
53%
Rio Mobile London
₹2,699
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 vs Rio Mobile London
Comparing the Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 vs Rio Mobile London across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Rio Mobile London runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Rio Mobile London the better performer.
Display: Both Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 and Rio Mobile London offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 features a LCD display compared to Rio Mobile London's TFT, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 and Rio Mobile London feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Rio Mobile London offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers 0.3 MP, making Rio Mobile London better for front camera photography.
Battery: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers a higher battery capacity with 1950 mAh, while Rio Mobile London offers 1500 mAh, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 and Rio Mobile London offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 receives a higher user rating of 3.9, while Rio Mobile London has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
₹3,300
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Rio Mobile London
₹2,699
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
53%
|
Release Date
|
25 Sep, 2014
|
26 Mar, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1950 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(101 ratings)
|
3.5/5
(497 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows v8.1
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.61 %
|
55.91 %
|
Design
Height
|
125 mm
|
125 mm
|
Width
|
64.3 mm
|
65.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.9 mm
|
9.7 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1950 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|