LG G3 Beat
₹6,999
(Discontinued)
|
52%
Inco Colossus
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
LG G3 Beat vs Inco Colossus
Comparing the LG G3 Beat vs Inco Colossus across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: LG G3 Beat runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Inco Colossus runs at 1.0 GHz, making LG G3 Beat the better performer.
Display: Inco Colossus offers a screen size of 5.3 inches, while LG G3 Beat offers 5 inches, making Inco Colossus the larger display of the two. LG G3 Beat features a IPS LCD display compared to Inco Colossus's LCD, making LG G3 Beat the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: LG G3 Beat offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Inco Colossus offers 5 MP, making LG G3 Beat better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: LG G3 Beat offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Inco Colossus offers 0.3 MP, making LG G3 Beat better for front camera photography.
Battery: LG G3 Beat offers a higher battery capacity with 2540 mAh, while Inco Colossus offers 2500 mAh, making LG G3 Beat better for longer battery life.
Storage: LG G3 Beat offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Inco Colossus offers 1 GB, making LG G3 Beat the better option for storage.
|
✕
LG G3 Beat
₹6,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Inco Colossus
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
30 Aug, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 400
|
Snapdragon S1
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
500 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.3 inches (13.46 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
540x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2540 mAh
|
2500 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
1 GB
|
User Ratings
|
2.9/5
(13 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 305
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
500 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.3 inches (13.46 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
540x960 px
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
208 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
71.86 %
|
68.98 %
|
Design
Height
|
137.7 mm
|
142 mm
|
Width
|
69.6 mm
|
79 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
12 mm
|
Weight
|
134 grams
|
220 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital ZoomBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Face detection Smile detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2540 mAh
|
2500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 15 Hours(3G) / Up to 16 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
1 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
N/A
|