Copy link to bookmark or share with others
LG W11 vs OPPO A15
Comparing the LG W11 vs OPPO A15 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO A15 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.3 GHz, while LG W11 runs at 2.0 GHz, making OPPO A15 the better performer.
Display: Both LG W11 and OPPO A15 offer the same screen size of 6.52 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both LG W11 and OPPO A15 feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: LG W11 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while OPPO A15 offers 5 MP, making LG W11 better for front camera photography.
Battery: OPPO A15 offers a higher battery capacity with 4230 mAh, while LG W11 offers 4000 mAh, making OPPO A15 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both LG W11 and OPPO A15 offer the same internal storage of 32 GB.
User Rating: OPPO A15 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while LG W11 has a rating of 4.
Summary
Spec Score
|
66%
|
71%
|
Release Date
|
21 May, 2021
|
21 Oct, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4230 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
6.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(396 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(9,221 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
109,267
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
15h 30m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 21, 2021
(Official)
|
Oct 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
109,267
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
80.93 %
|
83 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
88.7 %
|
Design
Height
|
166.2 mm
|
164 mm
|
Width
|
76.3 mm
|
75.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
175 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 Wide Angle1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4230 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
15h 30m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 23m 44s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|