|
67%
Lava Bold N2
₹9,699
@Amazon
|
72%
Itel Zeno 200 4G
₹9,799
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Bold N2 vs Itel Zeno 200 4G
Comparing the Lava Bold N2 vs Itel Zeno 200 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel Zeno 200 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.8 GHz, while Lava Bold N2 runs at 1.6 GHz, making Itel Zeno 200 4G the better performer.
Display: Both Lava Bold N2 and Itel Zeno 200 4G offer the same screen size of 6.75 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Lava Bold N2 and Itel Zeno 200 4G feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Lava Bold N2 and Itel Zeno 200 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Both Lava Bold N2 and Itel Zeno 200 4G offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Lava Bold N2 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Itel Zeno 200 4G offers 128 GB, making Lava Bold N2 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Lava Bold N2
₹9,699
@ Amazon
|
✕
Itel Zeno 200 4G
₹9,799
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
67%
|
72%
|
Release Date
|
27 Feb, 2026
|
16 Jul, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc 9863A
|
Unisoc T7250
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
10W
|
15W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(165 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
381,574
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 52m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹9,699
@ Amazon
|
₹9,799
@ Amazon
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 17, 2026
|
May 08, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
1 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Year
|
Custom UI
|
Android Go
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc 9863A
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 1.2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
28 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8322
|
Mali-G57
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
381,574
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
31.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
159
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
590 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
92.44 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
170 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
70 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
8.29 mm
|
Weight
|
193.7 grams
|
185 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes IP65
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.854 mm focal length 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
|
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
3840 x 2160 Pixels
|
3120 x 4160 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
10 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2 Primary Camera3 mm focal length 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
2k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 10W
|
Yes 15W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 52m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 17m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 n/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm, USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹9,699
@ Amazon
|
₹9,799
@ Amazon
|