Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
51%
Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438
₹4,279
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris 406q vs Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438
Comparing the Lava Iris 406q vs Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 the better performer.
Display: Both Lava Iris 406q and Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 offers 2 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 0.3 MP, making Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 offers 1350 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Lava Iris 406q and Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438 receives a higher user rating of 3.9, while Lava Iris 406q has a rating of 3.7.
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Spice Stellar Glide Mi-438
₹4,279
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
51%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
11 Apr, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1700 mAh
|
1350 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
3.9/5
(34 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.38 %
|
39.72 %
|
Design
Height
|
124 mm
|
145 mm
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
79 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
9.5 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1700 mAh
|
1350 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Mini
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|