Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
55%
XOLO Q500S IPS
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris 406q vs XOLO Q500S IPS
Comparing the Lava Iris 406q vs XOLO Q500S IPS across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Q500S IPS runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making XOLO Q500S IPS the better performer.
Display: Both Lava Iris 406q and XOLO Q500S IPS offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but XOLO Q500S IPS features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making XOLO Q500S IPS the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Lava Iris 406q and XOLO Q500S IPS feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Lava Iris 406q and XOLO Q500S IPS feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while XOLO Q500S IPS offers 1500 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Lava Iris 406q and XOLO Q500S IPS offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q and XOLO Q500S IPS both receive the same user rating of 3.7.
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
✕
XOLO Q500S IPS
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
55%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
11 Jul, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1700 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(862 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jul 11, 2014
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.38 %
|
57.59 %
|
Design
Height
|
124 mm
|
125 mm
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
63.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Smile detection |
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
1920x1080 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1700 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 7.6 Hours(3G) / Up to 16.1 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|