Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
XOLO Q900T
₹11,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris 406q vs XOLO Q900T
Comparing the Lava Iris 406q vs XOLO Q900T across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Q900T runs at a higher processing speed of 1.5 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making XOLO Q900T the better performer.
Display: XOLO Q900T offers a screen size of 4.7 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making XOLO Q900T the larger display of the two. XOLO Q900T features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making XOLO Q900T the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: XOLO Q900T offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making XOLO Q900T better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: XOLO Q900T offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO Q900T better for front camera photography.
Battery: XOLO Q900T offers a higher battery capacity with 1800 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making XOLO Q900T better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Lava Iris 406q and XOLO Q900T offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: XOLO Q900T receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Lava Iris 406q has a rating of 3.7.
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
✕
XOLO Q900T
₹11,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
N/A
|
10 May, 2014
|
Performance
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
MediaTek MT6589T
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.5 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
1700 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(78 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 10, 2014
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
MediaTek MT6589T
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
312 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.38 %
|
67.28 %
|
Design
Height
|
124 mm
|
133.8 mm
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
67.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
9.25 mm
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
1920x1080 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Capacity
|
1700 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 10 Hours(3G) / Up to 15 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|