Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
63%
ZTE Star 1
₹4,700
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris 406q vs ZTE Star 1
Comparing the Lava Iris 406q vs ZTE Star 1 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: ZTE Star 1 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.6 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making ZTE Star 1 the better performer.
Display: ZTE Star 1 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making ZTE Star 1 the larger display of the two. ZTE Star 1 features a LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making ZTE Star 1 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: ZTE Star 1 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making ZTE Star 1 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: ZTE Star 1 offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 0.3 MP, making ZTE Star 1 better for front camera photography.
Battery: ZTE Star 1 offers a higher battery capacity with 2300 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making ZTE Star 1 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris 406q offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while ZTE Star 1 offers 16 GB, making Lava Iris 406q the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while ZTE Star 1 has a rating of 3.3.
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
✕
ZTE Star 1
₹4,700
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
63%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
30 Apr, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
Snapdragon 400
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.6 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1700 mAh
|
2300 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
3.3/5
(89 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4 (KitKat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.6 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Adreno 305
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
2 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
441 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.38 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
124 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1700 mAh
|
2300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
16 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Single SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|