Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
54%
iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger
₹6,820
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris 406q vs iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger
Comparing the Lava Iris 406q vs iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger the better performer.
Display: Both Lava Iris 406q and iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Lava Iris 406q and iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Lava Iris 406q and iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger offers 1300 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Lava Iris 406q and iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger has a rating of 3.1.
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
✕
iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger
₹6,820
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
23 May, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1700 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
3.1/5
(50 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.38 %
|
57.55 %
|
Design
Height
|
124 mm
|
124.5 mm
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
63.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.3 mm
|
10.2 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
141.8 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1700 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|