Lava Iris Fuel 50
₹7,800
(Discontinued)
|
53%
Lava Iris Fuel 25
₹5,699
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris Fuel 50 vs Lava Iris Fuel 25
Comparing the Lava Iris Fuel 50 vs Lava Iris Fuel 25 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Lava Iris Fuel 50 and Lava Iris Fuel 25 run at the same processing speed of 1.3 GHz.
Display: Both Lava Iris Fuel 50 and Lava Iris Fuel 25 offer the same screen size of 5 inches, but Lava Iris Fuel 50 features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris Fuel 25's TFT, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris Fuel 50 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris Fuel 25 offers 5 MP, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Lava Iris Fuel 50 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Lava Iris Fuel 25 offers 0.3 MP, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Lava Iris Fuel 50 and Lava Iris Fuel 25 offer the same 3000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Lava Iris Fuel 50 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Lava Iris Fuel 25 offers 4 GB, making Lava Iris Fuel 50 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris Fuel 50 receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Lava Iris Fuel 25 has a rating of 3.6.
|
✕
Lava Iris Fuel 50
₹7,800
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris Fuel 25
₹5,699
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
53%
|
Release Date
|
06 Nov, 2014
|
13 Mar, 2015
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(662 ratings)
|
3.6/5
(32 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 13, 2015
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
196 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
65.14 %
|
63.92 %
|
Design
Height
|
144.8 mm
|
145.6 mm
|
Width
|
72.9 mm
|
74 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.5 mm
|
10.8 mm
|
Weight
|
160 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 13 Hours(3G) / Up to 17 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 15 Hours(3G) / Up to 19 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|