Lava Iris Win1
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
54%
Wiio WI Star 3G
₹4,390
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris Win1 vs Wiio WI Star 3G
Comparing the Lava Iris Win1 vs Wiio WI Star 3G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Wiio WI Star 3G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris Win1 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Wiio WI Star 3G the better performer.
Display: Wiio WI Star 3G offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Lava Iris Win1 offers 4 inches, making Wiio WI Star 3G the larger display of the two. Wiio WI Star 3G features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris Win1's LCD, making Wiio WI Star 3G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Lava Iris Win1 and Wiio WI Star 3G feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Wiio WI Star 3G offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Lava Iris Win1 offers 0.3 MP, making Wiio WI Star 3G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Wiio WI Star 3G offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Lava Iris Win1 offers 1950 mAh, making Wiio WI Star 3G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris Win1 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Wiio WI Star 3G offers 4 GB, making Lava Iris Win1 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Lava Iris Win1
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Wiio WI Star 3G
₹4,390
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
04 Dec, 2014
|
12 Dec, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1950 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(1,751 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 04, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
196 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
61.08 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
145.5 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
77.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
9.8 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
164 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1950 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Accelerometer
|