Lava Iris Win1
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
52%
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris Win1 vs iBall Andi 4L Pulse
Comparing the Lava Iris Win1 vs iBall Andi 4L Pulse across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Lava Iris Win1 and iBall Andi 4L Pulse run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: Both Lava Iris Win1 and iBall Andi 4L Pulse offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Lava Iris Win1 and iBall Andi 4L Pulse feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Lava Iris Win1 and iBall Andi 4L Pulse feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris Win1 offers a higher battery capacity with 1950 mAh, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 1500 mAh, making Lava Iris Win1 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris Win1 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 4 GB, making Lava Iris Win1 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris Win1 receives a higher user rating of 3.9, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Lava Iris Win1
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
04 Dec, 2014
|
05 Jan, 2015
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1950 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(1,751 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(114 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 04, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1950 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|