Lava Iris X1 Atom S
₹4,149
(Out of Stock)
|
52%
Intex Aqua 3G Neo
₹3,690
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Iris X1 Atom S vs Intex Aqua 3G Neo
Comparing the Lava Iris X1 Atom S vs Intex Aqua 3G Neo across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Intex Aqua 3G Neo runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Lava Iris X1 Atom S runs at 1.0 GHz, making Intex Aqua 3G Neo the better performer.
Display: Both Lava Iris X1 Atom S and Intex Aqua 3G Neo offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris X1 Atom S offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Intex Aqua 3G Neo offers 2 MP, making Lava Iris X1 Atom S better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Lava Iris X1 Atom S and Intex Aqua 3G Neo feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Intex Aqua 3G Neo offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while Lava Iris X1 Atom S offers 1400 mAh, making Intex Aqua 3G Neo better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris X1 Atom S offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Intex Aqua 3G Neo offers 4 GB, making Lava Iris X1 Atom S the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Iris X1 Atom S receives a higher user rating of 3.4, while Intex Aqua 3G Neo has a rating of 1.
|
✕
Lava Iris X1 Atom S
₹4,149
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Intex Aqua 3G Neo
₹3,690
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
22 Jun, 2015
|
15 Sep, 2015
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
Spreadtrum SC7731
|
|
Single Core (upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.4/5
(2,365 ratings)
|
1/5
(1 rating)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 22, 2015
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
Spreadtrum SC7731
|
Processor
|
Single core, 1 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Qualcomm Snapdragon
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
281.69 %
|
56 %
|
Design
Height
|
63.4 mm
|
125 mm
|
Width
|
25.5 mm
|
65 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.6 mm
|
10 mm
|
Weight
|
112 grams
|
105 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6 Hours(3G) / Up to 14 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v2.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|