|
60%
Lenovo A3900
₹5,699
(Discontinued)
|
53%
Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus
₹3,470
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lenovo A3900 vs Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus
Comparing the Lenovo A3900 vs Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lenovo A3900 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lenovo A3900 the better performer.
Display: Both Lenovo A3900 and Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus offer the same screen size of 5 inches, but Lenovo A3900 features a IPS LCD display compared to Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus's TFT, making Lenovo A3900 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lenovo A3900 offers 5 MP, making Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Lenovo A3900 and Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus feature a 2 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lenovo A3900 offers a higher battery capacity with 2300 mAh, while Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus offers 2000 mAh, making Lenovo A3900 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Lenovo A3900 and Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Lenovo A3900
₹5,699
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Spice Stellar Xlife M5 Plus
₹3,470
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
60%
|
53%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
13 Jun, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6752
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
2 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
2300 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.5/5
(8 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Custom UI
|
VIBE UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6752
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T760 MP2
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
196 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
67.06 %
|
64.96 %
|
Design
Height
|
142.8 mm
|
146 mm
|
Width
|
71.8 mm
|
72.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.95 mm
|
9.3 mm
|
Weight
|
157 grams
|
114 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2300 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 3 Hours(3G) / Up to 4 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|