|
50%
Mi-Fone Mi-A200
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Mi-Fone Mi-A200 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Mi-Fone Mi-A200 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Mi-Fone Mi-A200 runs at 0.8 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Lava Iris 406q offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Mi-Fone Mi-A200 offers 2.8 inches, making Lava Iris 406q the larger display of the two. Both Mi-Fone Mi-A200 and Lava Iris 406q feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Mi-Fone Mi-A200 offers 2 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Mi-Fone Mi-A200 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Mi-Fone Mi-A200 offers 1450 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Mi-Fone Mi-A200 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Mi-Fone Mi-A200
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
50%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
02 Aug, 2012
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon S1
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 800 MHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
2.8 inches (7.11 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
320x240 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1450 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
800 MHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
2.8 inches (7.11 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320x240 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
143 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
36.48 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
111 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
60 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
14.00 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
100 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1450 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
N/A
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|