|
52%
Micromax Bolt A089
₹5,999
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 250
₹3,779
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Micromax Bolt A089 vs Lava Iris 250
Comparing the Micromax Bolt A089 vs Lava Iris 250 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Micromax Bolt A089 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris 250 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Micromax Bolt A089 the better performer.
Display: Both Micromax Bolt A089 and Lava Iris 250 offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 250 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Micromax Bolt A089 offers 2 MP, making Lava Iris 250 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Micromax Bolt A089 and Lava Iris 250 feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Micromax Bolt A089 offers a higher battery capacity with 2100 mAh, while Lava Iris 250 offers 1450 mAh, making Micromax Bolt A089 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Micromax Bolt A089 and Lava Iris 250 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris 250 receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while Micromax Bolt A089 has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Micromax Bolt A089
₹5,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 250
₹3,779
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
22 Mar, 2014
|
11 Sep, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2100 mAh
|
1450 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(1,508 ratings)
|
3.6/5
(305 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
58.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
121.5 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
63.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
9.8 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Burst mode
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 15 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2100 mAh
|
1450 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 7 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 11.2 Hours(3G) / Up to 11.5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.49 W/kg Body: 1.18 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v2.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|