|
52%
Micromax Bolt A47
₹4,499
(Discontinued)
|
Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Micromax Bolt A47 vs Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus
Comparing the Micromax Bolt A47 vs Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Micromax Bolt A47 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus runs at 1.0 GHz, making Micromax Bolt A47 the better performer.
Display: Micromax Bolt A47 offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus offers 3.5 inches, making Micromax Bolt A47 the larger display of the two. Micromax Bolt A47 features a IPS LCD display compared to Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus's LCD, making Micromax Bolt A47 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Micromax Bolt A47 and Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Micromax Bolt A47 and Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Micromax Bolt A47 offers a higher battery capacity with 1600 mAh, while Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus offers 1350 mAh, making Micromax Bolt A47 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Micromax Bolt A47 and Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus offer the same internal storage of 512 GB.
User Rating: Micromax Bolt A47 receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus has a rating of 3.3.
|
✕
Micromax Bolt A47
₹4,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Zen Ultrafone 105 Plus
₹2,199
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
30 Jan, 2017
|
08 Jan, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1600 mAh
|
1350 mAh
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(748 ratings)
|
3.3/5
(138 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
125 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
12.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
640x480 fps
|
1280x720 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1600 mAh
|
1350 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.64 W/kg Body: 0.20 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
N/A
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
Hike Spuul MiLive Seven stars bubble X slice
|
N/A
|